Search and Rescue Services and the Search for Persons with Dementia

This present paper is dedicated to dementia as a multifaceted neurocognitive syndrome and provides a detailed illumination of its profound effects on behavior, particularly in the context of wandering. This is of crucial importance for Search and Rescue (SAR) services, which are confronted with the complex task of locating missing persons with cognitive impairments. The presentation is underpinned by current scientific findings to comprehensively elucidate both the neurobiological foundations of dementia and the practice-relevant implications for effective search strategies.

I. The Neurobiological Architecture of Dementia: A Detailed Examination of Cognitive Signatures Dementia, contrary to a widespread assumption, is not a singular disease but a complex syndrome. It is an umbrella term for a range of neurodegenerative diseases, all characterized by a progressive degeneration of the brain. This degeneration leads to a significant and often irreversible loss of cognitive functions, far exceeding the normal extent of age-related cognitive decline. The various forms of dementia differ fundamentally in their pathophysiology (the underlying disease mechanisms at the cellular and molecular level), the primarily affected brain regions, and the resulting specific symptomatic manifestations. This profound understanding is crucial for precise diagnostics, the development of targeted therapeutic approaches, and the derivation of adapted behavioral interventions.

A. Alzheimer’s Disease (AD): The Complex Interplay of Amyloid-β and Tau Pathology Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and represents one of the greatest challenges for modern medicine. Its neurobiological signature is clearly defined by the accumulation of two pathological proteins: amyloid-β (Aβ) and hyperphosphorylated Tau. The synergistic interplay of these two proteins is crucial for the development of the characteristic brain changes and the resulting cognitive deficits.

1. Amyloid-β (Aβ) Plaques: The Role of Extracellular Deposits and Neurotoxicity In Alzheimer’s disease, extracellular deposits of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides occur. These peptides arise from the abnormal proteolytic cleavage of the Amyloid Precursor Protein (APP). APP is an integral membrane protein whose physiological functions are not yet fully understood, but it likely plays a role in neuronal development, synaptic plasticity, and axonal transport (Selkoe & Hardy, 2016). In AD, however, APP is incorrectly cleaved by the sequential activity of the enzymes β-secretase (BACE1) and γ-secretase. This aberrant cleavage leads to the release of Aβ peptides of varying lengths, with Aβ40 and particularly Aβ42 being known as especially pathogenic due to its higher tendency for aggregation and fibril formation. The amyloid cascade hypothesis, originally postulated in 1992 by Hardy and Higgins and later further developed by Selkoe and Hardy (2016), forms the paradigmatic foundation for our understanding of AD pathogenesis. This hypothesis posits that the initial accumulation of Aβ oligomers and plaques is the primary trigger of the entire pathophysiological cascade of AD, ultimately leading to neurodegenerative processes. However, more recent research has brought the role of soluble Aβ species to the forefront: Walsh et al. (2002) were able to experimentally demonstrate that soluble Aβ oligomers, which appear even before the formation of macroscopically visible plaques, are highly neurotoxic. They directly interfere with synaptic plasticity, particularly Long-Term Potentiation (LTP), a cellular mechanism considered the basis for learning and memory (Walsh et al., 2002). This disruption of synaptic signal transmission and neuronal network function leads to an early dysfunction of neuronal networks, long before visible, macroscopic neuronal loss occurs. This “silent” phase of disease development, during which Aβ accumulation manifests, can often begin 15-20 years before the onset of clinical symptoms and can be detected using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with specific amyloid tracers (e.g., $^{18}$F-Florbetapir), representing a crucial advance in early diagnosis and intervention (Jack et al., 2010).

2. Neurofibrillary Tangles (NFTs): The Internal Destruction and Spread of Tau Pathology In addition to extracellular amyloid plaques, Neurofibrillary Tangles (NFTs) are the second, complementary neuropathological hallmark of AD. These are intracellular aggregates of the hyperphosphorylated Tau protein. Tau is an essential microtubule-associated protein (MAP) that physiologically plays a central role in the stability of the neuronal cytoskeleton and axonal transport (Nelson et al., 2012). Microtubules essentially form the “tracks” for the transport of nutrients, vesicles, and organelles along the axon, which is indispensable for neuronal integrity and function. In AD, there is an abnormal hyperphosphorylation of Tau by various kinase enzymes. This excessive phosphorylation causes Tau to lose its affinity for microtubules, dissociate, and instead aggregate with other hyperphosphorylated Tau molecules to form insoluble, paired helical filaments – the NFTs. These aggregates not only disrupt the physiological function of microtubules and axonal transport but are also directly cytotoxic by impairing proteasome activity and interfering with the degradation of other proteins. The spread of Tau pathology within the brain follows a characteristic pattern detailed by Braak and Braak (1991). It correlates significantly more strongly with the degree of cognitive impairment and neuronal loss than Aβ plaques (Nelson et al., 2012). This suggests that Tau pathology plays a more direct and causal role in the manifestation of clinical symptoms and the neurodegenerative process. The pathology typically begins in the transentorhinal regions and then spreads to the entorhinal cortex and the hippocampus (Braak & Braak, 1991) – regions crucial for memory formation and spatial navigation. From there, it successively spreads to other cortical and subcortical regions, reflecting progressive cognitive decline. Another crucial neuropathological feature of AD is the selective loss of cholinergic neurons in the Nucleus basalis Meynert(Whitehouse et al., 1982). These neurons are the primary source of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine for most of the neocortex and play a central role in memory, learning, attention, and wakefulness. The pronounced loss of these neurons significantly contributes to the primary memory impairments observed in AD patients and is the scientific basis for the use of cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., Donepezil, Rivastigmine) in the symptomatic therapy of AD.

3. Network Dysfunction: The Far-Reaching Effects on Brain Connectivity Beyond the focal damage caused by amyloid plaques and NFTs, Alzheimer’s disease is also characterized by a widespread dysfunction of neuronal networks. The brain does not function as a collection of isolated regions but as a complex, highly integrated network of areas communicating via billions of synapses and axonal pathways. In AD, this complex connectivity is disrupted, leading to widespread impairment of cognitive functions that extend beyond local lesions. Notably, the Default Mode Network (DMN) shows significantly altered connectivity in AD patients (Greicius et al., 2004). The DMN is a brain network that exhibits increased activity during rest phases, i.e., when the brain is not focused on a specific external task. It is closely linked to internally generated thoughts and functions such as self-reflection, episodic memory retrieval, future planning, mental travel into the past or future, and the processing of social information. Typical changes in the DMN in AD include reduced functional connectivity within the network (hypoconnectivity) and, in later stages, paradoxically, hyperconnectivity with other brain regions, indicating a disruption of normal resting-state activity and information integration. These widespread network disturbances explain the complex and varied symptoms that go beyond mere memory problems and are relevant to “wandering”:

Disorientation: Patients have severe difficulties orienting themselves in familiar surroundings and recognizing places or people. This is a direct consequence of impaired spatial navigation and memory formation, influenced by pathology in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, as well as the resulting network disturbances, particularly in the DMN and its connections to parietal areas.
Impairment of Executive Functions: This includes problems with planning, problem-solving, judgment, decision-making, and attention control. These complex functions depend on prefrontal-parietal networks, which are also affected in AD, and their connectivity is disrupted. The inability to develop a coherent plan or react to unforeseen situations makes individuals with dementia particularly vulnerable.
Difficulties with Spatial Orientation: This manifests not only as disorientation but also in specific problems such as recognizing routes or navigating complex environments. These difficulties play a central role in the known “wandering” events, where AD patients tend to get lost or wander aimlessly. This is often the result of a combination of memory loss (e.g., of their place of residence), impaired spatial cognition, a disturbed “internal map,” and the impaired ability to plan and execute complex sequences of actions (like finding the way home). In summary, the neurobiological architecture of Alzheimer’s disease represents a highly complex interplay of protein-pathological deposits (Aβ and Tau), progressive neuronal loss, and widespread network disturbances. A comprehensive understanding of these mechanisms is essential for improving future diagnostic methods and developing more effective therapeutic interventions that not only target individual proteins but also consider the restoration of neuronal network functions.

B. Vascular Dementia (VaD): The Complex Effects of Cerebral Ischemia Vascular Dementia (VaD) is the second most common form of dementia after Alzheimer’s disease and constitutes a heterogeneous group of syndromes. It does not arise from a single cause but from an accumulation of brain damage attributable to vascular diseases. This includes a broad spectrum of cerebrovascular events, such as major strokes (macroinfarcts), but also multiple, often unnoticed microinfarcts (lacunar infarcts), or chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (insufficient supply of blood and oxygen to the brain) (Pantoni, 2010). The crucial element is the impairment of blood supply to the brain, leading to neuronal damage and functional loss, typically through ischemic or hemorrhagic events.

1. Pathophysiology: From Silent Infarcts to Disrupted Connectivity The neurological damage in VaD is highly heterogeneous and can range from extensive, clinically manifest infarcts leading to specific focal neurological deficits, to microscopic lesions distributed throughout the brain. A characteristic feature is the particular vulnerability of the brain’s white matter to vascular damage. White matter primarily consists of myelinated nerve fibers that function as connectivity pathways (association, commissural, and projection fibers) linking different brain regions. Damage in these areas, often referred to as White Matter Lesions (WMLs) or leukoaraiosis, is a common finding in imaging studies (e.g., MRI) and correlates with the extent of cognitive impairment. The interruption of neuronal connectivityin these important pathways has far-reaching consequences for integrated brain function. It leads to a slowing of information processing, as synaptic efficiency and coordination between different brain areas are disrupted. Furthermore, it results in disturbances of complex cognitive functions that require smooth and rapid integration of information from multiple brain regions. Unlike Alzheimer’s disease, which typically shows a continuous and gradual cognitive decline, the course of VaD is often stepwise (Roman, 2002). This means that cognitive decline can occur in spurts after each new vascular event (e.g., a small stroke or an episode of acute hypoperfusion), with periods of relative stability in between. This is an important diagnostic criterion for differentiating it from AD.

2. Cognitive Manifestations: Focus on Executive Functions and the Risk of Wandering The cognitive symptoms of VaD often differ significantly from those of Alzheimer’s disease. While episodic memory is primarily affected in AD, executive function impairments are frequently the most dominant features in VaD. These include:

Problems with planning and problem-solving: Difficulties breaking down complex tasks into individual steps, setting priorities, and approaching them systematically.
Impaired judgment and decision-making: This can lead to poor decisions or inappropriate behavior in social or everyday situations.
Disorders of attention control: Difficulties maintaining attention (sustained attention), concentrating (focused attention), or flexibly switching between tasks (attentional shifting).
Slowing of psychomotor speed: A general decline in the speed of thought and action. These deficits significantly impair a person’s ability to orient themselves in a new or complex environment and to react adaptively to unexpected situations. This is particularly relevant for the safety of affected individuals in everyday life and significantly increases the risk of wandering. For example, if a person with VaD leaves their familiar surroundings, they can easily become disoriented and unable to find their way back due to impaired planning and orientation skills, as well as compromised problem-solving abilities. In addition to cognitive deficits, mood and behavioral disorders are common concomitants of VaD. Depression and apathy (a pronounced lack of motivation and interest) are particularly prevalent (Roman, 2002). These affective symptoms can further impair the quality of life of those affected and their relatives, as well as complicate the ability to cope with daily life and cooperate during search operations.

C. Lewy Body Dementia (DLB) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD): Specific Diagnostic and Search-Relevant Challenges Besides Alzheimer’s disease and Vascular Dementia, there are other important forms of dementia, each with unique neurobiological features and clinical presentations. Lewy Body Dementia (DLB) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) pose specific diagnostic and thus also search-relevant challenges, especially concerning the phenomenon of wandering.

1. Lewy Body Dementia (DLB): The Triad of Challenges Lewy Body Dementia is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by intracellular deposits of α-synuclein in neurons, known as Lewy bodies (McKeith et al., 2005). These protein aggregates disrupt the normal function of nerve cells, particularly in brain regions relevant to cognition, movement, and mood (e.g., brainstem, limbic system, cortex). DLB exhibits a unique symptom triad that distinguishes it from other forms of dementia and makes the deployment of rescue services for missing persons particularly challenging:

Fluctuating Cognition: This is a core feature of DLB and presents a major diagnostic and practical challenge. The state of attention, alertness, and cognitive performance can change dramatically within hours or days(Ferman et al., 2014). A person may be perfectly clear, oriented, and cooperative one moment, and completely disoriented, somnolent, unresponsive, or hallucinating the next. These unpredictable fluctuations make the predictability of a missing person’s behavior extremely difficult. A patient who was lucid in the morning might be helpless and confused in the afternoon, significantly complicating the search for them and interaction with them.
Recurrent Visual Hallucinations: Individuals with DLB frequently experience detailed, vivid, and complex visual hallucinations, often of people or animals (McKeith et al., 2005). These hallucinations can lead to extreme confusion, anxiety, or even attempts to escape perceived threats. If a person experiences hallucinations of animals, people, or threatening scenarios, this can cause them to flee their homes in panic or venture into dangerous situations, which in turn can drive wandering.
Parkinsonian Motor Symptoms: Many DLB patients develop extrapyramidal symptoms similar to those of Parkinson’s disease, such as bradykinesia (slowness of movement), rigidity (muscle stiffness), postural instability, and tremor (McKeith et al., 2005). These motor impairments can severely restrict mobility. This not only makes independent movement difficult for the affected person and increases the risk of falls, but also their detectability in rough terrain or in conditions of limited visibility, as they may be unable to react quickly, draw attention to themselves, or escape from a difficult situation.

2. Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD): Personality and Behavioral Changes at the Forefront Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) is an umbrella term for a heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative diseases that primarily affect the frontal and temporal lobes of the brain (Neary et al., 1998). Unlike Alzheimer’s disease, where episodic memory is often first impaired, FTD frequently presents initially with personality and behavioral changes, while episodic memory can remain relatively intact. The clinical presentation varies depending on the affected subtype, but common symptoms that can influence wandering include:

Disinhibition and Impulsivity: This is a characteristic feature that can lead to risky wandering. Affected individuals often show poor judgment and may make sudden, ill-considered decisions, such as entering dangerous, inappropriate, or publicly inaccessible areas (e.g., construction sites, private property, abandoned buildings) (Miller et al., 1991). The inability to assess consequences makes these individuals particularly vulnerable.
Apathy: A pronounced lack of motivation, initiative, and interest is also common. This can lead to the person remaining in a state of passivity, even if they are in an emergency. They may not respond to search calls, instructions, or offers of help, which significantly complicates search and rescue.
Stereotypical Behaviors: Repetitive, seemingly purposeless actions are typical of FTD. This includes stereotypical pacing in specific patterns, such as always walking along the same path, repeatedly opening the same door, or touching the same object. This repetitive behavior can cause the person to be caught in a loop and not move from a location, which can narrow the search to specific, well-defined areas.
Language Disorders (Primary Progressive Aphasia): Another subtype of FTD manifests primarily through progressive language disorders, often known as primary progressive aphasia (PPA). This leads to difficulties in speaking (expressive aphasia) or understanding language (receptive aphasia), which significantly complicates communication with finders or rescue teams (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011). A person in an emergency situation might be unable to state their name, describe their location, or ask for help, making them even more isolated in a crisis. In summary, each form of dementia has its specific neurobiological signatures and clinical manifestations. Understanding these differences is not only crucial for diagnosis and treatment but also for developing tailored strategies in dealing with the potential wandering of individuals with dementia and for the effective execution of search and rescue operations.

II. The Behavioral Ecology of “Wandering” in Dementia: A Deeper Analysis The phenomenon of “wandering” (roaming or elopement) is a prominent and potentially life-threatening symptom of dementia that poses an immense burden for affected individuals, their relatives, and caregivers. It is far more than just arbitrary or random behavior; rather, it is often the result of complex interactions between progressive cognitive deficits, unmet psychological and physical needs, and specific environmental factors. A profound understanding of these dynamics is crucial for developing prevention strategies and ensuring effective search and rescue measures.

A. Etiology of Wandering: Cognitive, Affective, and Environmental Factors

1. Cognitive Disintegration and Navigational Impairments At the core of wandering lies profound disorientation in time and space, also known as topographagnosia or topographic disorientation. Affected individuals lose the ability for cognitive mapping of the environment – that is, to create an internal, mental representation system of the surroundings, orient themselves within it, and determine their own location relative to other places. This is a highly complex process dependent on specialized neuronal structures and integrating multiple cognitive domains. Particularly critical are damages to the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. These brain regions are essential for the formation of “place cells” and “grid cells”, which are indispensable for spatial orientation (O’Keefe & Nadel, 1978; Moser et al., 2008). Place cells fire selectively when a person is at a specific spatial location in their environment, while grid cells map a hexagonal grid in space, thus enabling an internal “map” of the environment fundamental for navigation and understanding spatial relationships. In individuals with dementia, especially Alzheimer’s patients, these cell types and the structures housing them are damaged early and massively. This leads to the person losing orientation even in familiar surroundings, failing to recognize known paths, and being unable to find their way back, even if they are only a few meters from their home. Impaired executive function – the ability to plan, solve problems, exercise judgment, adapt flexibly, and initiate action – dramatically exacerbates the situation. It prevents the person from making rational decisions, adapting to new circumstances, developing a coherent plan to return home, or reacting appropriately to dangers (Béland et al., 2009). Even if a person with dementia had a rudimentary insight that they are lost, they often lack the cognitive capacity to develop a plan to seek help or find their way back.

2. Purposeful but Misguided Behavior Many episodes of wandering are not aimless or arbitrary but are based on a confused sense of reality or the retrieval of past memories that are no longer applicable in the current reality. The affected person might be pursuing a specific, albeit misguided, goal:

“Going home”: This is a common and particularly heart-wrenching motive, even if the person is already in their current home. The “home” in their confused mind may be a former, perhaps long-gone residence, a cherished place from their childhood, or an idealized notion of safety and security.
“Going to work”: Especially in individuals who had a busy working life and strongly identified with their profession, the urge to go to work can be deeply ingrained and persist as part of their disturbed routines.
Searching for a deceased partner or relative: The loss of temporal orientation and the associated inability to remember or process the death of a loved one can lead the person with dementia to actively search for that individual.
Fulfilling a perceived obligation: This could be shopping, taking out the trash, picking up children from school, or other everyday activities that were once part of their routine and are now repeated inappropriately or at the wrong time, driven by an inner sense of necessity. This behavior is understandable through the concept of retrogenesis (Reisberg et al., 1999). This theory states that cognitive abilities in dementia are lost in the reverse order of their development, which can lead to regression and behaviors reminiscent of earlier life stages. An adult with dementia may thus exhibit behaviors of a child or adolescent, including the impulse to wander when primary needs cannot be understood or adequately communicated.

3. Affective States and Unmet Needs The Need-Driven Dementia-Compromised Behavior (NDB) Theory (Algase et al., 1996) postulates that behavioral disturbances in dementia, including wandering, are often an expression of unmet needs that the person cannot verbally express due to their cognitive impairments. These needs can be diverse and are closely linked to the person’s psychological and physical states:

Anxiety and Agitation: Overwhelm from a loud, unstructured, or unfamiliar environment, feelings of isolation, confusion, or fear of forgetting can trigger a strong urge to flee. Wandering can be an attempt to escape this anxiety or find comfort in movement.
Boredom and Understimulation: A lack of mental or physical stimulation or meaningful activities can lead to restless wandering. The patient unconsciously seeks engagement or purpose to compensate for sensory and cognitive deprivation.
Pain or Physical Discomfort: Untreated pain, thirst, hunger, a full bladder, constipation, or other physical ailments may not be communicable due to cognitive limitations. Instead, they manifest as general restlessness, agitation, and the impulse to wander, often in hopes of finding or alleviating the cause of discomfort.
Circadian Rhythm Disturbances: Many individuals with dementia suffer from a severe disruption of their natural sleep-wake cycle, attributable to damage to the suprachiasmatic nucleus and other areas regulating circadian rhythm. This often leads to nocturnal restlessness and wandering (Witting et al., 1990), a phenomenon known as “sundowning”. This is particularly dangerous as visibility is greatly reduced at night, and the risk of hypothermia or accidents (e.g., falls, collisions with vehicles) increases dramatically.

4. Environmental Factors The physical and social environment plays a crucial role in triggering and reinforcing wandering (Algase et al., 2003):

A new or overstimulating environment (e.g., a hospital stay, moving to a nursing home, or a large crowd) can increase confusion and disorientation, triggering the urge to wander.
Lack of visual cues for orientation (e.g., identical hallways in a building, no personal items or familiar signage) can worsen disorientation and heighten feelings of being lost.
Insufficient stimulation or recreational opportunities can lead to boredom, frustration, and the need to explore the surroundings or give in to an inner restlessness.

B. Phenomenology of Wandering: Empirical Data and Search Patterns Research on “Lost Person Behavior” (LPB), particularly the extensive studies by Koester (2008) based on the analysis of thousands of real search and rescue cases, provides empirically founded data on the movement patterns and typical find locations of missing persons with dementia. This data is invaluable for developing Probability of Detection (POD) maps in search areas, which help rescue teams increase the efficiency of their operations and optimize resource allocation.

1. Movement Patterns Individuals with dementia often exhibit characteristic movement patterns once they become lost:

“Straight Line Travel”: This is often observed initially when the person still has a rudimentary goal in mind (e.g., the desire to “go home” or reach a specific place) or is “fleeing” in a particular direction, whether from a perceived threat or internal restlessness. They attempt to follow a direct path, even if it is not the most efficient.
“Circuitous/Looped Travel”: This pattern is common when the person loses orientation and desperately tries to find a starting point or moves within a supposedly familiar but no longer recognized environment (Koester, 2008). This can lead to repeated loops in a limited area, often within a block or a certain distance from the starting point, as an expression of trying to re-establish familiarity.
“Obstacle Following/Avoidance”: Individuals with dementia often follow linear features in the landscape, such as roads, paths, fences, streams, or even power lines (Rowe et al., 2012). This is because such structures offer perceived guidance or orientation, even if their actual purpose or end has been forgotten. They might also try to overcome obstacles like fences or impenetrable thickets, but in many cases, they will follow these structures instead if it is easier or more instinctive.

2. Distances and Find Locations Statistical analysis of search cases shows that the majority of individuals with dementia are found within a relatively narrow radius from the last known point of contact – often within 1 to 3 kilometers. This underscores the importance of a rapid response and systematic search in the immediate vicinity.

Urban/Suburban Environments: A retrospective study by Sharda et al. (2017) in an urban setting showed that over 80% of missing individuals with dementia were found within 1 km and over 95% within 3 km from the starting point. Common find locations reflect the urban structure:
- Gardens and private properties: They may accidentally enter neighbors’ gardens, often searching for a supposed “home.”
- Side streets and parks: Less busy areas or green spaces offer apparent safety.
- Vacant buildings, garages, basements: Places that might offer shelter or a perceived refuge.
- Proximity to transportation arteries: Roads, railway tracks, or bus stops they might have tried to use, often aiming to take a (non-existent) bus or train home. The tendency to want to return home can lead them to try to enter “familiar” houses or wander into neighborhood gardens that resemble their former homes.
Rural/Natural Areas: In rural areas, find locations are often shaped by natural features:
- Proximity to water bodies: Rivers, lakes, ponds, or streams are points of attraction and pose a high risk. A meta-analysis by Lin et al. (2020) found that drowning is one of the most common causes of death in missing individuals with dementia.
- Dense forests, thickets: Places that offer shelter but also hinder visibility and access for search teams.
- Proximity to buildings: Sheds, barns, hunting cabins, or other agricultural buildings can serve as shelter or a perceived refuge. In these environments, hypothermia is a particularly common cause of death, as individuals are often inadequately dressed and exposed to climatic conditions.

3. Survival Factors The probability of survival decreases drastically with the duration of absence. A study by Buglass et al. (2011) found that the mortality rate in missing individuals with dementia significantly increases after 24 hours. This underscores the necessity of initiating immediate and comprehensive search measures. Several factors influence survival chances:

Age and pre-existing conditions: Older individuals and those with chronic illnesses (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases) are more susceptible to complications and the effects of exposure.
Weather conditions: Extreme temperatures (heat or cold), heavy precipitation (rain, snow), and wind are crucial for the extent of hypothermia or hyperthermia.
Type of clothing: Appropriate clothing for weather conditions is life-saving.
General physical condition: The ability to move, attract attention, and withstand the elements. Knowledge of these etiological factors and empirical movement patterns is crucial for preventing wandering, designing safe environments for individuals with dementia, and optimizing search and rescue strategies to maximize the safety of those affected.

III. Optimizing Search and Rescue Operations: A Multidimensional, Evidence-Based Strategy Success in searching for missing individuals with dementia is not a matter of chance but depends on a rapid, coordinated, and evidence-based response. This strategy must integrate traditional search methods as well as innovative technologies and a profound psychological understanding of dementia. Given the potentially life-threatening consequences of wandering, a proactive and well-thought-out approach is essential.

A. Pre-hospital Crisis Management and Prevention: Preparation is Everything The most effective approach to minimizing the risks of wandering is prevention and comprehensive preparation before an emergency occurs.

1. Dementia-Friendly Communities and Prevention Creating safe environments is a fundamental pillar of prevention. This includes urban planning measures as well as the design of care facilities:

Safe pathways and infrastructure: Cities can facilitate orientation and promote mobility for individuals with dementia by designing sidewalks, reducing tripping hazards, and providing clear, easily understandable signage.
Enclosed gardens and safe outdoor areas: In nursing homes or private residential areas, specially secured gardens or courtyards with circular paths and visual cues can give residents the opportunity to move freely and safely outdoors, satisfying their urge to move without the risk of elopement.
Information campaigns and public awareness: Educating the public about dementia and associated behaviors can help passersby react appropriately when encountering disoriented individuals, show empathy, and take the right steps, e.g., by contacting emergency services or the family. Initiatives like the “Dementia-Friendly America Initiative” (Gauthier et al., 2019) promote community-based approaches aimed at improving understanding of dementia and creating a supportive environment for affected individuals and their families.

2. Technological Aids for Relatives Modern technology offers valuable support in monitoring and quickly locating individuals with dementia:

GPS Trackers/Wearables: The use of GPS trackers specifically designed for individuals with dementia, which can be discreetly integrated into shoes, bracelets, watches, or as pendants, is invaluable. Mobile apps that enable tracking via smartphones can also be helpful. A systematic review by Rowlands et al. (2018) confirmed that GPS tracking devices significantly reduce search time and substantially lower the risk of emergencies. Successful programs like “Project Lifesaver” in the USA, which use radio transmitters, achieve a success rate of nearly 100% in rapid location (Mihalik et al., 2011) by facilitating distance measurement to the transmitter.
Emergency Bracelets/QR Codes: Robust bracelets with engraved emergency information or QR codes that, when scanned, immediately provide contact details and important medical information (e.g., allergies, medication, existing dementia diagnosis) can facilitate quick identification and return, even if the person is unresponsive or cannot articulate.

3. Emergency Plans and Family Education Family and primary caregivers are the first line of defense. They should have a detailed emergency plan that leaves no room for uncertainty in a crisis:

Immediate contact with emergency services: Clear instructions on whom to call first in an emergency (e.g., police, local SAR organizations), with all necessary contact details.
Availability of important information: This includes current photos of the person (also considering changes in appearance), a list of relevant medical data (allergies, pre-existing conditions, medication, especially time-critical ones), typical behaviors (e.g., where they like to go, what they like to do, when they wander), recently worn clothing, and potential triggers for wandering.
Environmental safety measures: This can include installing alarms on doors and windows, securing windows with locks, hiding car keys, or setting up safe exits to prevent unnoticed departure from the house. The Alzheimer’s Association (2021) offers comprehensive guidelines and checklists for such emergency plans, tailored to the specific needs of individuals with dementia.

B. Acute Phase: Rapid Response and Information Management Once a person with dementia is missing, swift and systematic action is crucial.

1. Prioritization of the Operation The report of a missing person with dementia should always be treated as the highest priority and trigger an immediate, comprehensive response. The first hours after disappearance are critical for the person’s probability of survival. This critical time window is often referred to as the “Golden Hour” or “Golden 24 Hours.” During this phase, dehydration, hypothermia/hyperthermia, untreated injuries, or the effects of missed medication can quickly become critical and drastically reduce survival chances (Koester, 2008). Rapid mobilization of resources is therefore paramount.

2. Comprehensive Information Gathering (Initial Assessment) The interview with the informant (relatives, caregivers, neighbors) is the primary and often most critical source for initiating the search and formulating the search strategy. Beyond standard questions, specific dementia-relevant information must be gathered to provide insights into the missing person’s mindset and possible actions:

Exact Time Last Seen (TLS) and location: This precise information is crucial for calculating the Probability of Survival (POS) and the potential range the person could have covered, considering their physical condition.
Preferences and routines: Are there places the person frequently visits or has visited in the past? These could be former homes, workplaces, favorite paths, specific shops, places of worship, or even locations from their childhood. Knowledge of these past routines and habits can provide valuable clues to possible search areas, even if these places are distant and initially seem illogical to outsiders.
Triggers for wandering: Were there specific triggers that might have encouraged wandering, such as boredom, anxiety, pain, an attempt to complete a perceived task, or “sundowning” (nocturnal restlessness and disorientation)? Recognizing such patterns can provide clues about the person’s behavior.
Communication ability: Can the person speak or make themselves understood? What is the degree of disorientation? A person who can barely communicate may require a different search strategy, as they may not respond to calls or articulate a need for help.
Medication intake: When were medications last taken, especially for critical conditions like diabetes, heart disease, or Parkinson’s? The absence of important medications can rapidly and drastically worsen the person’s condition.
Physical condition and mobility: Are there physical limitations that could affect movement (e.g., arthritis, previous strokes, poor eyesight, walking aids)? This influences the possible range, the type of terrain to be searched, and the urgency of the search.
Clothing and items carried: What clothing is the person wearing (color, type, brand)? Do they have keys, money, identification papers, or personal items (e.g., glasses, hearing aid, handbag)? Often, individuals with dementia carry few or no personal items, which complicates identification. However, the color and type of clothing can be crucial for visual search, especially from the air.

C. Operational Strategy: Adaptive Search Tactics and Technology Transfer Based on the collected information and empirical data on “Lost Person Behavior,” search strategies are developed and implemented.

1. Creation of a Sector Map and Resource Allocation Information from LPB studies and statistical data (e.g., on typical movement radii and patterns) enables the identification of Likely Search Areas, which are then divided into smaller, manageable sectors. Resources such as specially trained search dogs, drones, and ground teams are allocated according to the estimated probability of finding the person in these sectors. The International Search and Rescue Dog Organisation (IRO) recommends specific search patterns for missing persons with cognitive impairments that consider typical behavioral patterns.

2. Search Dog Deployment (Mantrailing) Mantrailing dogs are an invaluable resource and are increasingly used in the search for missing persons with dementia. They are trained to follow individual human scent trails, even over difficult terrain, for extended periods, and through human or animal contamination. A study by Schoon and de Bruin (2012) confirmed the high effectiveness of mantrailing dogs in tracking human scent trails across various terrain types and time intervals. Their ability to distinguish scent trails from vehicles or water is also valuable.

Specific Challenges: Effectiveness heavily depends on the quality of the scent trail (e.g., how fresh it is, whether it has been overlaid by other people, wind, weather conditions like rain that blurs the trail). A fresh reference item (e.g., unwashed clothing last worn by the missing person) is essential for the dog to pick up the specific scent trail and thus maximize the success rate.

3. Aerial Search (Drones and Helicopters) The use of drones and helicopters is revolutionizing search, especially in rough terrain or at night:

Thermal Imaging Cameras: These are particularly effective in darkness, in densely vegetated areas, or in fog. Humans radiate body heat, which stands out clearly against the cooler background. Drones can quickly scan large areas and identify potential heat sources. A study by Colomina and Correia (2017) showed the high efficiency of UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, drones) in search and rescue operations, especially through the integration of thermal imaging technologies.
Optical Cameras: For daytime searches, high-resolution optical cameras are useful for identifying specific features or the person’s clothing. Modern zoom functions allow details to be recognized from a great height.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) for Object Recognition: Current research focuses on using AI algorithms that can analyze drone images in real-time to automatically detect human silhouettes, specific features (e.g., clothing color), or unusual patterns. Deep Learning algorithms, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), can process large amounts of video footage and flag suspicious objects, exponentially increasing the efficiency of visual search by eliminating human fatigue and error rates (e.g., Rudol & Gavrilova, 2009).
Operational Limits: Effectiveness can be influenced by extreme weather conditions (strong wind, heavy rain), very dense vegetation (which can shield heat signatures), and the “heat signature” of the environment (e.g., heated surfaces, animals that could be misinterpreted as false signals). Legal frameworks for drone deployment must also be observed.

4. Ground Teams (Foot and Vehicle Search) Systematic search by ground teams remains an indispensable part of the search strategy and is often conducted in combination with aerial and mantrailing operations:

Systematic Search: Combing areas in linear patterns, especially along linear features such as roads, paths, streams, field edges, and fences. The probability of individuals with dementia following such structures is empirically proven (Koester, 2008), as they often serve as orientation points.
Specific Target Points: Prioritized checking of places where the person might hide or seek shelter: sheds, garages, vacant buildings, construction containers, basements, and other potential hiding spots into which the person might have retreated out of fear or confusion (Rossmo & Van Blaricom, 2008). Understanding the “search signature” of such places is crucial.
Involving the Public (“Community Search”): Coordinated involvement of volunteers and neighbors can significantly increase the coverage of the search area. However, it is important to train volunteers in safe approach and communication with individuals with dementia to avoid worsening the situation and to gain the person’s trust.

5. Psychological Aspects of Approach When the person is found, the manner of approach is crucial to avoid further trauma and ensure a safe return:

De-escalation and Trust Building: A calm, non-confrontational approach is essential. Direct eye contact can be perceived as a threat by individuals with dementia suffering from paranoia or delusions. Short, simple sentencesshould be used, a calming tone of voice maintained, and an open, non-threatening body posture adopted. Techniques of Validation Therapy (Feil, 1992) can be helpful to address the person’s emotional needs instead of directly correcting their altered reality.
Validating the Person’s Reality: Instead of directly correcting the person (“You are not in your old home, you are here with me”), one should validate their feelings (“I understand you want to go home” or “It’s okay that you’re scared”). Afterward, an attempt can be made to gently guide the person into current reality with distraction or build a bridge to a safe environment.
Patience and Empathy: Individuals with dementia can react anxiously, confused, disoriented, agitated, or even aggressively. Understanding their cognitive limitations and recognizing that their behavior is an expression of their illness and not personally directed is crucial. Training in person-centered care (Kitwood, 1997) can help rescue personnel understand the perspective of the person with dementia and react appropriately to de-escalate the situation.
Initial Medical Care: After discovery, medical care takes precedence. Dehydration, hypothermia/hyperthermia, and injuries must be treated promptly and as a priority. Often, individuals with dementia are in a critical condition due to exposure and their pre-existing conditions.

D. Post-Operation and Evidence-Based Optimization The process of search and rescue operations does not end with finding the person; post-operation is crucial for continuous improvement and knowledge generation.

1. Debriefing and Case Analysis Every search operation should undergo a detailed analysis and structured debriefing to learn from successes and failures. Data on search times, find locations, resources used, communication strategies, as well as failures or unexpected challenges, should be systematically recorded and integrated into databases. This allows for the continuous improvement of algorithms and search strategies (Koester, 2008) and helps make future operations more effective, for example, by refining Probability of Detection models.

2. Research and Development Continuous research in the fields of dementia epidemiology, neurocognitive modeling of wandering, as well as the development and validation of new technologies (e.g., Artificial Intelligence for pattern recognition in drone video footage, improved sensor technologies for detecting vital signs) are essential for improving search outcomes. This includes the development of prevention measures and better training methods for rescue personnel, based on the latest findings in neuroscience and behavioral research.

3. Interdisciplinary Collaboration Ultimate success depends on close, integrated collaboration among all involved stakeholders: police, fire departments, emergency medical services, civilian SAR organizations, medical personnel, care facilities, relatives, and research institutions. Regular joint exercises and training sessions, based on the latest scientific findings, are essential to ensure that all parties can act effectively and coordinately to maximize the safety of the affected individuals.

Conclusion and Outlook: A Holistic Strategy for the Safety of People with Dementia The search for missing persons with dementia presents a unique and highly complex challenge for rescue services. It far exceeds the demands of traditional search techniques and requires a deep, interdisciplinary understanding of the neurobiological, psychological, and behavioral specifics of dementia, as substantiated by the scientific findings mentioned above. The potentially life-threatening consequences of wandering demand a proactive and well-thought-out approach. The key to minimizing risks and maximizing the chances of success in finding missing individuals with dementia lies in an intelligent combination of various, mutually reinforcing elements:

Evidence-Based Strategies: Applying search tactics based on empirical data and research findings on “Lost Person Behavior” (e.g., Koester, 2008) is not only more efficient but also more effective. Knowledge of typical movement patterns, common find locations, and the effects of environmental factors allows rescue teams to deploy their resources precisely and purposefully.
Innovative Technologies: The use of GPS trackers, enabling quick and precise location (Rowlands et al., 2018), as well as drones with thermal imaging cameras and increasingly AI-supported image analysis (Rudol & Gavrilova, 2009), revolutionizes search capabilities. These technologies can cover search areas in less time and significantly improve visibility in difficult environments or at night, thereby optimally utilizing the crucial “Golden Hour.”
Psychologically Informed Communication Strategies: When a missing person is found, the method of approach is critical. A deep understanding of the cognitive limitations and emotional needs of individuals with dementia allows for de-escalating, trust-building communication. Applying techniques from Validation Therapy (Feil, 1992) and person-centered care (Kitwood, 1997) helps reduce anxiety and confusion and safely return the person, rather than further traumatizing them or provoking aggression. Beyond the acute search operation, it is of utmost importance to create a society better prepared to protect and find people with dementia in crisis situations. This requires a far-reaching and sustainable approach based on several pillars:
Continuous Public Awareness: Comprehensive education campaigns and information programs can help communities develop a better understanding of the multifaceted nature of dementia. This not only fosters empathy and acceptance but also equips citizens with the necessary knowledge on how to react to a disoriented person and initiate appropriate help measures. An informed and compassionate community is a safer community for people with dementia.
Strengthening Preventive Measures: Implementing dementia-friendly urban and residential planning, providing low-threshold technologies for relatives (e.g., through subsidization or easy accessibility of GPS trackers), and promoting emergency plans at the family level are essential. Every successful preventive measure reduces the risk of wandering and thus the need for complex search and rescue operations.
Promoting Interdisciplinary Research: Dementia research, particularly in the area of neurocognitive modeling of wandering and behavioral interventions, must be continuously advanced. This also includes the development and validation of new technologies (e.g., improved AI algorithms for pattern recognition in drone video footage) and the optimization of search strategies. Only through ongoing scientific insights can we deepen our understanding of dementia and find even more effective ways to ensure the safety of those affected.
Improving Collaboration: Effective coordination and communication among all relevant stakeholders – from rescue services and medical facilities to nursing homes and relatives – are crucial. Regular joint exercises and the exchange of best practices strengthen this collaboration and ensure a smooth response in emergencies to save lives and alleviate suffering. The challenge of wandering in dementia is complex but not insurmountable. Through the consistent application of scientific knowledge, the use of modern technologies, and a deep human understanding, we can significantly improve the safety and quality of life for people with dementia.

Selected References:

Algase, D. L., Beck, C., Kolcaba, K., Moss, M., Murray, M., & Tseng, H. M. (1996). The puzzle of wandering: An integrative review of the literature. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 22(1), 10-18.
Algase, D. L., Son, G. R., & Beel-Brovn, C. (2003). The phenomenon of wandering. Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly, 4(2), 111-124.
Alzheimer’s Association. (2021). Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimer’s Association.
Béland, F., Ducharme, F., & Antoine, P. (2009). Factors associated with wandering in persons with Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(4), 633-644.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991). Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related neurofibrillary changes. Acta Neuropathologica, 82(4), 239-259.
Buglass, E., et al. (2011). What determines the outcome of missing person searches for people with dementia? The European Journal of Public Health, 21(5), 585-590.
Colomina, I., & Correia, L. (2017). UAV-based photogrammetry for engineering applications—A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 126, 1-13.
Feil, N. (1992). Validation: The Feil Method. Edward Feil Productions.
Ferman, T. J., Smith, G. E., Boeve, B. F., Graff-Radford, N. R., & Petersen, R. C. (2014). DLB: A common and often misdiagnosed dementia. Neurology, 82(10), 875-882.
Gauthier, S., Rosa-Neto, P., Morais, J. A., & Webster, C. (2019). World Alzheimer Report 2019: Attitudes to dementia. Alzheimer’s Disease International.
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., et al. (2011). Clinical diagnostic criteria for the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Brain, 134(7), 1980-1991.
Greicius, M. D., et al. (2004). Default-mode network activity distinguishes Alzheimer’s disease from healthy aging: A combined fMRI and PET study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(13), 4637-4642.
Hardy, J. A., & Higgins, G. A. (1992). Alzheimer’s disease: The amyloid cascade hypothesis. Science, 256(5054), 184-185.
Jack, C. R., et al. (2010). Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer’s pathological cascade. The Lancet Neurology, 9(1), 119-128.
Kitwood, T. (1997). Dementia Reconsidered: The Person Comes First. Open University Press.
Koester, R. J. (2008). Lost Person Behavior: A Search and Rescue Guide on Where to Look—for Land, Air and Water. DCS.
Lin, T. P., et al. (2020). Accidental drowning among people with dementia: A systematic review. Gerontology, 66(4), 362-371.
McKeith, I. G., et al. (2005). Diagnosis and management of dementia with Lewy bodies: Third report of the DLB Consortium. Neurology, 65(12), 1863-1872.
Mihalik, M. L., et al. (2011). Evaluating the effectiveness of Project Lifesaver. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 17(5), 442-448.
Miller, B. L., et al. (1991). Behavioral and cognitive correlates of progressive aphasias, frontotemporal dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease. Annals of Neurology, 30(6), 721-727.
Moser, E. I., Kropff, E., & Moser, M. B. (2008). Place cells, grid cells, and the brain’s spatial representation system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31, 69-89.
Neary, D., et al. (1998). Frontotemporal dementia and motor neuron disease: an update. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 57(6), 577-584.
Nelson, P. T., et al. (2012). Correlation of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathologic changes with cognitive status: a review of the literature. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology, 71(1), 47-58.
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Clarendon Press.
Pantoni, L. (2010). Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis to clinical implications. Lancet Neurology, 9(7), 689-702.
Reisberg, B., et al. (1999). Towards a clinical staging model for Alzheimer’s disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 874(1), 32-48.
Roman, G. C. (2002). Vascular dementia: distinguishing characteristics, clinical features, and therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 977(1), 346-353.
Rossmo, D. K., & Van Blaricom, D. (2008). Geographical profiling in missing persons investigations. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5(2), 143-159.
Rowe, J. B., et al. (2012). Loss of ability to follow linear features in Alzheimer’s disease: A navigational impairment. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 29(1), 227-237.
Rowlands, A., et al. (2018). The efficacy of GPS tracking devices for supporting independent living and preventing harm in people with dementia: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 24(8), 536-547.
Rudol, P., & Gavrilova, M. (2009). Human Detection for Search and Rescue Using Aerial Image. International Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2009. CGAMES’09.
Schoon, A., & de Bruin, E. (2012). The use of scent dogs in searching for missing persons. Forensic Science International, 219(1-3), 200-205.
Selkoe, D. J., & Hardy, J. (2016). The amyloid hypothesis at 25 years. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 8(6), 595-608.
Sharda, R., et al. (2017). Outcomes of missing persons with dementia in an urban setting. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(1), 163-168.
Walsh, D. M., et al. (2002). Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid beta protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation in vivo. Nature, 416(6880), 535-539.
Whitehouse, P. J., et al. (1982). Alzheimer’s disease: a defect in central cholinergic neurons. Annals of Neurology, 10(2), 122-126.
Witting, W., et al. (1990). Alterations in the circadian activity rhythm in Alzheimer’s disease. Biological Psychiatry, 27(10), 1195-1200.